Cesidio Tallini's Love Signs
Back in 1970, a writer by the name of
Steven Schmidt published a book entitled Astrology 14. It
proposed revolutionising astrology in at least two ways:
- By having the beginning of the Zodiac start with the
actual constellation the Sun is transiting in at this
moment on the day of the Vernal Equinox.
- By adding two additional signs to the Zodiac, Cetus and
Ophiuchus.
According to Schmidt, this would have made Astrology more
"scientific", and a more respectable profession. Although
there is nothing wrong with having astrology reflect the
heavens a little more closely, the problem with Schmidt's
approach is multi-fold.
First, astrology would still be considered a pseudo-science by
most astronomers even with Schmidt's reforms, because most
astronomers don't believe the positions of the planets at the
moment of one's birth have anything to do with one's
personality, or one's destiny; in other words, the assumption
that astronomers don't consider astrology scientific is
correct, but Schmidt fails to understand the real source of
the problem.
Second, the Sun at the Vernal Equinox does not start at
Zero Degrees in the
constellation of Pisces if we really want to get technical
about the precession of the equinoxes, but Schmidt's approach
ignores that reality entirely.
Third, the length of the constellations is not equal like the
length of the astrological signs.
Fourth, an astrological sign is not the same thing as an
astronomical constellation.
Fifth, the ecliptic, which is the only thing that matters in
astrology (even the latitude North or South of the ecliptic
doesn't matter in astrology), strictly speaking crosses 13
constellations now, not 14.
Sixth, the ecliptic will cross a 14th constellation in a
century or so, but that constellation is not Cetus, but Orion.
Seventh, it is true that astrology once had 10 signs, two less
signs than the current 12, so expanding the Zodiac to 14 signs
does makes sense given that the ecliptic already crosses 13
constellations; however, Orion is not only a more correct 14th
constellation, but it also happens to be opposite to
Ophiuchus, and this makes the transition from 12-sign
astrology to 14-sign astrology much easier and
straightforward.
Essentially there is nothing wrong with reforming astrology in
order to reflect the heavens a little more closely, but
Schmidt's approach literally throws real astrology out, and
replaces it with hocus pocus astronomy without a meaning.
These are the reasons why I believe Bucksfanian astrology is
superior to Schmidt's Astrology 14.
In Bucksfanian astrology the Zodiac still starts with Aries,
and the sign of Aries still has its traditional First House
meaning. Schmidt's Astrology 14, on the other hand, makes
Pisces the first sign, and the First House as well. This is
needlessly confusing, and turns wholesome tropical astrology
into a nightmarish and bad sideral astrology. I'm not
surprised if Schmidt's proposed reforms never caught on.
Also, Bucksfanian astrology starts including some celestial
bodies other than the Sun, the Moon, and the planets, and
these inclusions, while original, are not without rationality
under an astrological perspective. Bucksfanian astrology
eliminates the dual rulership of Venus in Taurus, as well as
the dual rulership of Mercury in Virgo, and makes the
asteroids of Ceres and Vesta the new rulers of Taurus and
Virgo. Also, the additional signs of Bucksfanian astrology,
i.e. Orion and Ophiuchus, have unique rulers in Pallas and
Chiron. This makes astrology richer, and actually more
accurate in an interpretive point of view!
Recently another two revolutions took place in Bucksfanian
astrology. I was able to discover some signs where the planets
are in exaltation, or the sign in which the influence of a
particular planet is very strong, but I soon discovered that
while the old Ptolemaic rules of planetary exaltation were
useful as a starting point, following the traditional planets
of exaltation and fall leads to nothing more than a big and
senseless gobbledegook.
The new Bucksfanian Dignities and Debilities curiously point
to some traditional Ptolemaic planets in exaltation, but
Bucksfanian Dignities and Debilities were created by following
a very specific rule! Through this rule, if you know where a
planet is in dignity, you also know where it is in exaltation,
by simple mathematics! The sign where a planet falls can also
be established by simple mathematics! Here are the fully
reformed Bucksfanian Dignities and Debilities:
| Bucksfanian
Dignities & Debilities |
| Zodiac Sign |
Dignity |
Exaltation |
Detriment |
Fall |
| Capricorn |
Saturn |
Mars |
Moon |
Venus |
| Aquarius |
Uranus |
Ceres |
Sun |
Pluto |
| Pisces |
Neptune |
Pallas |
Vesta |
Chiron |
| Aries |
Mars |
Mercury |
Venus |
Jupiter |
| Taurus |
Ceres |
Moon |
Pluto |
Saturn |
| Orion |
Pallas |
Sun |
Chiron |
Uranus |
| Gemini |
Mercury |
Vesta |
Jupiter |
Neptune |
| Cancer |
Moon |
Venus |
Saturn |
Mars |
| Leo |
Sun |
Pluto |
Uranus |
Ceres |
| Virgo |
Vesta |
Chiron |
Neptune |
Pallas |
| Libra |
Venus |
Jupiter |
Mars |
Mercury |
| Scorpio |
Pluto |
Saturn |
Ceres |
Moon |
| Ophiuchus |
Chiron |
Uranus |
Pallas |
Sun |
| Sagittarius |
Jupiter |
Neptune |
Mercury |
Vesta |
The second revolution that took place recently is much more
fun and interesting to the average person. You've heard about
Linda Goodman's Love Signs, but do you know what Cesidio
Tallini's Love Signs looks like? You can see them below.
| Bucksfanian Sun
Sign Compatibility1 |
| Zodiac Sign |
Begins |
Ends |
Compatibility With |
| Capricorn |
01/01 |
26/01 |
Capricorn, Pisces, Taurus, Virgo,
Ophiuchus |
| Aquarius |
27/01 |
21/02 |
Aquarius, Aries, Orion, Libra,
Sagittarius |
| Pisces |
22/02 |
19/03 |
Pisces, Taurus, Gemini, Scorpio,
Capricorn |
| Aries |
20/03 |
14/04 |
Aries, Orion, Cancer, Ophiuchus,
Aquarius |
| Taurus |
15/04 |
10/05 |
Taurus, Gemini, Leo, Sagittarius,
Pisces |
| Orion |
11/05 |
05/06 |
Orion, Cancer, Virgo, Capricorn,
Aries |
| Gemini |
06/06 |
01/07 |
Gemini, Leo, Libra, Aquarius,
Taurus |
| Cancer |
02/07 |
27/07 |
Cancer, Virgo, Scorpio, Pisces,
Orion |
| Leo |
28/07 |
22/08 |
Leo, Libra, Ophiuchus, Aries,
Gemini |
| Virgo |
23/08 |
17/09 |
Virgo, Scorpio, Sagittarius,
Taurus, Cancer |
| Libra |
18/09 |
13/10 |
Libra, Ophiuchus, Capricorn, Orion,
Leo |
| Scorpio |
14/10 |
08/11 |
Scorpio, Sagittarius, Aquarius,
Gemini, Virgo |
| Ophiuchus |
09/11 |
04/12 |
Ophiuchus, Capricorn, Pisces,
Cancer, Libra |
| Sagittarius |
05/12 |
31/12 |
Sagittarius, Aquarius, Aries, Leo,
Scorpio |
References and Notes
- If you were born a few days before the end of a
Bucksfanian sign, consider the next sign of the
Bucksfanian Zodiac compatible with yourself along with
your own Sun sign, and consider also the compatible signs
to the next sign as compatible with yourself in
relationships. E.g., if you are a Taurus born a day or two
before the sign of Orion, consider both Taurus and Orion
as compatible signs, as well as the signs of Cancer,
Virgo, Capricorn, and Aries. Also, do not confuse the
traditional Sun sign of a person with their Bucksfanian
Sun sign, which may be different in many cases. The rules
above are general rules of compatibility; they are based
essentially on conjunctions, trines, and septiles with the
sign in question. However, the position of the Moon and
the other planets in the Bucksfanian Zodiac will also have
a strong influence on who you are attracted to, and who
you enjoy spending your time with.